Site under construction
These webpages are currently being updated. We apologise for any inconvenience.
If you cannot find what you are looking for, please contact planningpolicy@cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk
27.1 The NPPF is clear that good design is a key aspect of sustainable development and the creation of high quality, beautiful and sustainable buildings and places is fundamental to what the planning and development process should achieve (NPPF, paragraph 131).
27.2 Local Plans should set out a clear design vision and expectations (NPPF, paragraph 132). All local authorities should prepare design guides or codes consistent with the principles set out in the National Design Guide and National Model Design Code, and which reflect local character and design preferences (NPPF, paragraph 133).
27.3 Policies should ensure developments function well, are visually attractive in respect of architecture, layout and landscaping, sympathetic to local character, maintain a strong sense of place, layout, building types and materials, create safe and accessible places with a high standard of amenity for users (paragraph 135).
27.4 New development should be planned to adapt to the impacts arising from climate change and to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions, through location, orientations and design. Any local requirements for the sustainability of buildings in plans should reflect the Government’s policy for national technical standards (paragraph 164).
|
Local Plan |
Policy reference |
Policy summary |
|---|---|---|
|
Promotes sustainable high quality design and incorporation |
||
|
Sets out the design principles and contextual analysis to |
||
|
Local Plan (Part Two) |
Seeks to secure sustainable design features in new |
27.5 We believe that the content of Local Plan (Part One) policy ENV 6 remains relevant and up to date with national policy and that it should be retained. However, we propose separating the sustainable construction elements of the policy to better support the government’s targets and local climate emergency ambitions, as set out below.
27.6 The ‘High quality design’ policy would include a reference to the borough-wide Design Code that is being prepared, update the national design standards referred to in the policy description and incorporate criteria for reducing crime from Local Plan (Part Two) policy DM 3, which would be deleted. It would also include policy for the Area of Special Advertisement Control, currently included in Local Plan (Part Two) policy DM 17, which would be deleted.
27.7 The ‘Sustainable construction’ and ‘Adaptation’ policies would include criteria for mitigating and adapting to climate change, incorporating relevant elements from Local Plan (Part Two) policy DM 4, which would be deleted.
The new Local Plan will promote sustainable, high quality design and construction. Development should, where appropriate:
Relevant and appropriate design standards and guidance should be used to help guide development across the borough including:
The Area of Special Control of Advertisements, as shown on the policies map, places additional restrictions on applications for advertisement consent with the designated area.
Do you agree with the suggested policy approach towards high quality design, as set out in DS 1 ‘High quality design’ above? If not please suggest how it could be amended?
If the Council produces a borough-wide Design Code, should this form part of the new Local Plan?
What should the Council's approach be to the designated Area of Special Control of Advertisements?
The policy approach aims to encourage high sustainability standards in buildings and promote the application of the energy hierarchy with the aim of achieving carbon net zero in new residential and commercial developments. Development should be resilient to, and adapt to the future impacts of climate change through the inclusion of a range of appropriate measures. The reuse of buildings are expected to improve overall energy performance.
The National Design Guide 2019 identifies the need for new developments to follow the energy hierarchy to:
All new build developments will be required to demonstrate how they meet the requirements of the energy hierarchy by considering each of the following in turn:
As an alternative to the sustainable construction requirements (1-5) set out above, positive weight will be given to development proposals that:
In these cases, a full sustainable design statement/ evidence demonstrating compliance with policy requirements (1-5), will not be required and it will be sufficient to submit the technical information required to demonstrate that the relevant standard can be achieved.
Do you agree with the suggested policy approach towards sustainable construction, as set out in DS 2 ‘Sustainable construction’ above? If not please suggest how it could be amended?
Do you think that the new Local Plan should adopt the National Design Guide energy hierarchy – or is there an alternative?
Do you think that the new Local Plan should set a higher local standard beyond the building regulations requirements to achieve net zero carbon in all new developments?
Do you have any comments on the suggested policy requirements: 1. Energy efficiency; 2. Efficient, fossil-free and renewable energy supply; 3. Carbon/ energy offsetting; 4. Embodied carbon; or 5. Water efficiency - the type and size of development they should apply to, or the targets that should be met?
Do you think that the new Local Plan policy should offer an alternative route to compliance if the development achieves a recognisable industry standard/ certification?
Do you have any comments on the type and size of development that the alternative compliance should apply to, or any alternative suggestions for the level and type of certification that could be required, for example, BREEAM Carbon Standard, RIBA 2030 Climate Challenge, or UK Net Zero Carbon Buildings Standard?
The policy approach will expect developments to include site and building-level measures to be resilient to future climate change impacts and provide for the comfort, health, and wellbeing of current and future occupiers and the surrounding environment over the lifetime of the development. These measures should be integral to the layout and design of new development and should take the vulnerability of the building occupants into account.
Development should be designed, through its layout, form and massing and through the use of green/blue infrastructure, to:
The use of green/blue infrastructure should provide multifunctional benefits in relation to climate change adaptation. Where appropriate to its context, this should include the use of living roofs with a sufficient substrate depth to maximise cooling benefits.
Building designs and building-integrated measures should:
Proposals for development should demonstrate through an adaptation strategy how these issues will be addressed. This should include technical modelling and assessment of the risk of overheating in current and future climate change scenarios.
In considering the likely impact of climate change over the lifetime of the development (particularly in relation to overheating), reference should be made to the most recent climate change projections.
Do you agree with the suggested policy approach towards climate adaptation, as set out in DS 3 ‘Climate adaptation’above? If not please suggest how it could be amended?