Site under construction
These webpages are currently being updated. We apologise for any inconvenience.
If you cannot find what you are looking for, please contact planningpolicy@cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk
14.1 Transport issues should be considered using a vision-led approach to identify transport solutions that deliver well-designed, sustainable places, identifying and pursuing opportunities to promote walking, cycling and public transport use (NPPF paragraph 109).
14.2 Significant development should be focused on locations which are or can be made sustainable, through limiting the need to travel and offering a genuine choice of transport modes, recognising that solutions will vary between urban and rural areas (NPPF, paragraph 110).
14.3 If setting local parking standards, Local Plan policies should take into account accessibility and type of development, availability of public transport, car ownership levels and the need for electric vehicle (EV) charging (NPPF, paragraph 112).
14.4 Maximum parking standards should only be set where they are necessary for managing the local road network, or for optimising the density of development in city and town centres and other locations that are well served by public transport. In town centres, local authorities should seek to improve the quality of parking so that it is convenient, safe and secure, alongside measures to promote accessibility for pedestrians and cyclists (NPPF, paragraph 113).
14.5 Local authorities should ensure that in assessing sites that may be allocated for development, sustainable transport modes are prioritised taking account of the vision for the site, type of development and location, safe and suitable access for all users and any significant impacts can be mitigated through a vision-led approach (NPPF, paragraph 115).
|
Local Plan |
Policy reference |
Policy summary |
|---|---|---|
| Local Plan (Part One) |
Minimise the need to travel by locating development accessible to local services by a range of transport modes, improve public transport facilities, include adequate car and cycle parking provision, support town centres and maximise sustainable low carbon forms of transport. Safeguard current and disused transport corridors, infrastructure and freight movement opportunities. |
|
|
Identifies Chester Western Relief Road, improvements to the link between Winsford/Middlewich and the M6, and the Winnington Swing Bridge as priority local road network schemes, and safeguards land between A54 Winsford Railway Station to Stanthorne from development for road and junction improvements. |
||
|
Local Plan (Part Two) |
Identifies land for a new park and ride site at the M53/A56 junction, sets out criteria for development of a new park and ride site, and supports proposals that will improve the operation of the A56 Hoole Road corridor. |
|
|
Local Plan (Part Two) |
Supports proposals for the enhancement and provision of car parking to serve Chester, Hartford, Winsford, Helsby Frodsham and Cuddington rail stations, and safeguards land for the expansion and/or improvement of facilities at: Winsford, Hartford, Northwich, Greenbank, Frodsham, Helsby, Lostock Gralam, Delamere, Acton Bridge, Cuddington rail stations. |
|
|
Local Plan (Part Two) |
Safeguards and protects all rail corridors and railway lines from development that would prejudice their future transport use, including: Mickle Trafford-Shotton, Helsby/ Mouldsworth, adjacent New Warrington Road, Tattenhall-Whitchurch. |
|
|
Local Plan (Part Two) |
Sets criteria for safe access to new development sites for all users and the provision and protection of sufficient parking to service the needs of development, with regard to the Council’s latest adopted parking standards. |
|
|
Local Plan (Part Two) |
Sets criteria for the protection, and wherever possible, enhancement and extension of public rights of way, footpaths/ bridleways, cycle routes and waterways. |
14.6 We will promote the co-location of new development, community services, and sustainable transport hubs with good access to walking, cycling and public transport, ensuring developments achieve a high level of integrated connectivity. This aligns with the general approach taken by the current Local Plan policies. This would mean updating Local Plan (Part One) policy STRAT 10, as set out below:
The overall approach is to minimise the need for travel, particularly travel by solo occupancy cars and vans, by locating development so it is accessible to local services and facilities by a range of transport modes, following a vision-led approach and a sustainable transport hierarchy.
A fairer and more sustainable transport system which enables a stronger, thriving future for all communities of Cheshire West and Chester by 2040, prioritising:
New development will be encouraged in more sustainable locations, recognising that the approach to transport will vary depending on site location.
Fundamentally, developments and places should maximise any opportunities for people to be able to meet their regular day to day needs within a reasonable (10 minute/800 metres) walking distance of their homes, as well as being able to travel outside of their settlements by a range of sustainable travel choices.
New developments will be designed to accommodate and shape future travel demand in a scenario where our LTP vision is achieved, with reduced reliance on private cars, and significantly increased numbers of public transport, walking, wheeling and cycling trips, following the sustainable transport hierarchy.
Applicants will be required to demonstrate through a transport assessment, how their proposal meets our vision, and through a Travel Plan set out plans to monitor and take action where the vision is not being met.
Current and disused transport corridors and infrastructure, including roads, railway lines, sidings and stations, will be safeguarded from development which would preclude their future transport use.
Opportunities will be sought to extend and improve access to local footpath and cycle networks, including greenways, canal towpaths and the Public Rights of Way networks.
Proposals for new industrial, warehousing, energy and waste development should maximise opportunities to transport materials and waste products by non-road modes of transport and make suitable provision for lorry parking. Sites alongside the Manchester Ship Canal, Weaver Navigation and rail network may be particularly suitable for freight use and these opportunities should be integrated into development proposals where feasible.
Proposals for new, re-opening or the enhancement of railway stations, including the expansion and/or improvement of facilities, the provision of cycle and car parking, and the provision of interchange or rail freight facilities will be supported.
Sufficient parking should be provided as part of the integrated vision-led approach to transport on development sites.
We will review current standards in the Parking Standards SPD and the role of current parking zones, to meet a number of key criteria, including:
Do you agree with the suggested policy approach towards transport and accessibility, as set out above in TA 1 ‘Transport and accessibility’? If not please suggest how it could be amended?
Should we include a policy which takes a hierarchical approach in terms of prioritising transport infrastructure?
14.7 Current Local Plan (Part One) policies STRAT 7 and STRAT 10 and Local Plan (Part Two) policies EP 1, N 5, T 1, T 2, T 3, T 4, T 5, and DM 37 set out a range of actions, allocations, routes, schemes and local transport infrastructure priorities that are promoted/safeguarded from development.
14.8 Depending on the spatial strategy option taken forward for the new Local Plan, and subject to carrying out the necessary future transport and movement assessments for clusters of growth, some of the schemes may need to be included, amended or deleted, as listed below:
The suggested policy approach is to review the existing transport infrastructure priorities, and consider if any of the schemes need to be amended or deleted in the new Local Plan, or if there are any additional schemes that should be included.
| Current policy | Priority |
|---|---|
| STRAT 7 Middlewich | Potential for improving journey times along A54 between J18 of the M6 and Winsford |
| STRAT 10 Transport and accessibility |
|
| EP 1 Ellesmere Port settlement area |
|
| N 5 Gadbrook Park |
|
| T 1 Local road network improvement schemes |
Focus for s106 contributions:
Safeguards land between A54 Winsford Railway Station to Stanthorne in Winsford for road/junction improvements |
| T 2 A56 Hoole Road Corridor |
|
| T 3 Railway stations |
Safeguards land for expansion/ infrastructure improvements around the following rail stations:
|
| T 4 Rail corridors |
Identifies disused rail corridors safeguarded from development at:
|
| T 5 Parking and access |
Identifies the parking standards zone boundaries, as defined in the Parking Standards SPD, at:
|
| DM 37 Recreational routeways |
Identifies the following strategic recreational routeways:
|
Are there any schemes listed above in TA 2 ‘Key local transport infrastructure priorities’ that should be retained, modified, or deleted?
Are there any other transport schemes that should be included?