Site under construction
These webpages are currently being updated. We apologise for any inconvenience.
If you cannot find what you are looking for, please contact planningpolicy@cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk
30.1 The NPPF identifies that it is essential that there is a sufficient supply of minerals to provide the infrastructure, buildings, energy and goods that the country needs. It also states that minerals are a finite natural resource and can only be worked where they are found (NPPF, paragraph 222).
30.2 Paragraph 223 of the NPPF also highlights that planning policies should:
|
Local Plan |
Policy reference |
Policy summary |
|---|---|---|
|
Identifies that Cheshire West and Chester will make provision for the adequate, steady and sustainable supply of sand, gravel, salt and brine whilst ensuring the prudent use of our important natural finite resources. It indicates how this will be achieved. |
||
|
Indicates how the steady and adequate supply of aggregate land-won sand and gravel will be provided through existing sites, an allocation for an extension, a Preferred Area and Area of Search. |
||
|
Local Plan (Part Two) |
M 2 Minerals safeguarding areas - prior extraction of minerals |
Identifies Mineral Safeguarding Areas and sets criteria to be met for non-mineral development within those areas. |
|
Local Plan (Part Two) |
Sets out criteria for the assessment of proposals for minerals development. |
|
|
Local Plan (Part Two) |
M 4 Proposals for exploration, appraisal or production of hydrocarbons |
Sets criteria for the assessment of proposals for all stages of oil and gas development (exploration, appraisal and production). |
|
Local Plan (Part Two) |
Identifies that provision for a steady and sustainable supply of salt and brine will be provided from existing operations and Preferred Areas. |
|
|
Local Plan (Part Two) |
M7 Industrial sand proposals |
Identifies that a steady and adequate supply of silica sand will be maintained by the allocation of a site at Rudheath Lodge. Sets criteria for silica sand extraction outside this site. |
|
Local Plan (Part Two) |
Identifies that minerals infrastructure will be safeguarded from incompatible development. Sets criteria for non-mineral development with the potential to impact on a mineral infrastructure safeguarded site. |
30.3 Retain current Local Plan (Part One) policy ENV 9 and combine with Local Plan (Part Two) policies M 1 to M 8. The allocated site for sand and gravel at Forest Hill, north of the railway line (Local Plan (Part Two) policy M 1.B) now has planning permission.
Cheshire West and Chester will make provision for the adequate, steady and sustainable supply of sand, gravel, salt and brine, contributing to the sub-national guidelines for aggregate land-won sand and gravel, whilst ensuring the prudent use of our important natural finite resources.
In order to ensure sustainable use and extraction of minerals, the Council will:
The Council will maintain a steady and adequate supply of aggregate sand and gravel over the Plan period and will maintain a minimum seven-year landbank. Provision will be made for the extraction of at least 16 million tonnes over the plan period (0.8 million tonnes per annum). The requirement to provide a minimum seven-year supply beyond the plan period would result in an additional requirement of at least 5.6 million tonnes. This is a total requirement of at least 21.6 million tonnes.
This will be achieved by:
Any proposed minerals developments within the Preferred Area would need to consider potential impacts on the nearby Local Wildlife Site, SSSI, Ramsar Site and SAC, for example in terms of groundwater and provide mitigation measures, if necessary, to avoid any significant detrimental impacts on biodiversity.
Proposals for new sites within the Area of Search, as identified on the policies map, will only be supported where it has been demonstrated that permitted reserves, allocated site and/or Preferred Area cannot meet the required level of provision set out in this policy.
Proposals for any other sand and gravel sites outside the existing sites, allocated site, Preferred Area and Area of Search will only be supported where it has been demonstrated that the required level of provision set out in this policy cannot be met from within these areas.
The Council will maintain a steady and adequate supply of salt and brine. To do this, salt and brine will continue to be provided from:
Any proven additional requirements for salt extraction during the plan period will, subject to planning permission, be met from within the Preferred Area for rock salt extraction at Winsford Rock Salt Mine, as identified on the policies map.
Any proven additional requirements for salt extraction in the form of brine, during the plan period will, subject to planning permission, be met from within the Preferred Areas for controlled brine extraction at Holford Brinefield A, B, C and D, as shown on the policies map.
Any proposals involving production or use of brine and salt must ensure sustainable use of this resource.
Salt or brine proposals within the Preferred Areas will be supported where it has been demonstrated that they accord with relevant development plan policies. Any proposals outside the permitted sites or preferred areas will only be supported where it has been demonstrated that the required level of provision cannot be met from within these areas.
A steady and adequate supply of silica sand will be maintained throughout the plan period. This will be achieved by:
The existing Rudheath Lodge site, as identified on the policies map, will be safeguarded against non-mineral development that prejudices its ability to supply industrial sand.
Proposals for silica sand extraction outside this site will be supported provided that:
Do you agree with the suggested policy approach towards minerals supply, as set out in MS 1 ‘Minerals supply’ above? If not please suggest how it could be amended?
If you are aware of other sites that may be suitable for minerals development, please provide details.
Proposals for minerals development (sand and gravel or silica sand) will be supported where:
Planning permission to extend a site will normally be conditioned so that the extension area can only be worked once mineral working within the existing site has largely been completed, unless it has been demonstrated that there are operational reasons why this is not practicable.
Do you agree with the suggested policy approach towards proposals for minerals development, as set out in MS 2 ‘Proposals for minerals development’ above? If not please suggest how it could be amended?
Minerals safeguarding areas (MSAs) will safeguard Cheshire West and Chester's extent of finite natural resources from incompatible development. The cover areas of sand and gravel and salt and brine. Within an MSA, as identified on the policies map, non-mineral development will only be supported if the applicant can demonstrate that:
A Mineral Resource Assessment should be submitted alongside any major non-mineral developments within MSAs, to provide a thorough assessment of the opportunities for prior extraction and use of the sand and gravel from within the site. Sand and gravel should be extracted from the site and re-used as part of the development or transported for off-site processing and use wherever possible. This is to ensure that important mineral resources are not unnecessarily sterilised and are used wherever possible. A minerals management plan should be submitted as part of major planning applications within MSAs.
The two existing sand and gravel sites (Cheshire Sands, Oakmere and Forest Hill, Sandiway, including their permitted extensions) are safeguarded against non-mineral development that prejudices their ability to supply sand and gravel. The existing silica sand site at Rudheath Lodge is safeguarded against non-mineral development that prejudices its ability to supply silica sand. Proposed non-minerals developments in close proximity to these quarries must avoid or minimise potential impacts on mineral extraction and if, after applying the ‘agent of change principle, there is still some risk of constraint to mineral extraction, the development will only be supported if the merits of the development clearly outweigh the effect on the safeguarded site.
Significant infrastructure that supports the supply of minerals in CWaC will also be safeguarded from incompatible development. Non-mineral development (excluding the development types identified in the policy explanation) with the potential to impact on a mineral infrastructure safeguarded site used for mineral processing, handling, and transportation will not be supported unless it can be demonstrated that:
Do you agree with the suggested policy approach towards minerals safeguarding, as set out in MS 3 ‘Safeguarding’ above? If not please suggest how it could be amended?
Proposals for all stages of oil and gas development (exploration, appraisal and production) will be supported where:
Do you agree with the suggested policy approach towards oil and gas developments, as set out in MS 4 ‘Oil and gas developments’ above? If not please suggest how it could be amended?
Proposals for minerals development and oil and gas development will be supported where it can be demonstrated that the scheme includes an appropriate phased sequence of extraction, restoration and after use and aftercare which will enable long-term enhancement of the environment.
Proposals for restoration and aftercare of minerals and oil and gas sites, including proposals for review of restoration strategies and plans, will be supported where:
Restoration proposals will be subject to a minimum five-year period of aftercare. Where proposals or elements of proposals, such as features of biodiversity interest, require a longer period of management the proposal will only be permitted if it includes details of the period of extended aftercare and how this will be achieved.
Do you agree with the suggested policy approach towards minerals restoration, as set out in MS 5 ‘Restoration’ above? If not please suggest how it could be amended?