Site under construction
These webpages are currently being updated. We apologise for any inconvenience.
If you cannot find what you are looking for, please contact planningpolicy@cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk
7.1 Local Plans should promote sustainable patterns of development to meet the development needs of their area; align growth and infrastructure; improve the environment; mitigate climate change (including by making effective use of land in urban areas) (NPPF, paragraph 11).
7.2 The Local Plan should encourage sustainable economic growth, set criteria, and identify strategic sites, for local and inward investment to match the strategy and to meet anticipated needs over the plan period (NPPF, paragraph 86b). Planning policies and decisions should recognise and address the specific locational requirements of different sectors (NPPF, paragraph 87).
Map 7.1 Ellesmere Port settlement area and key constraints (View full image)

|
Local Plan |
Policy reference |
Policy summary |
|---|---|---|
|
Supports substantial economic growth for employment uses, makes provision for 4800 new dwellings to 2030. |
||
|
Local Plan (Part One) |
Key economic sites in Ellesmere Port are identified as; Hooton Park, Ince Park, New Bridge Road, Stanlow. |
|
|
Sets criteria for all developments. Pedestrian links and new railway crossing and public services hub supported on policies map. |
||
|
Local Plan (Part Two) |
Identifies the employment land allocations in Ellesmere Port, to meet the strategic development requirements of Local Plan (Part One) policy STRAT 2. Site specific criteria included in policies EP 2.A-H. |
|
|
Local Plan (Part Two) |
The Stanlow oil refinery is of national importance and safeguarded for continued use for petrochemical and related industries. Sets criteria for the redevelopment of any vacant, under-used or derelict land for employment use. (Policy boundary includes New Bridge Road). |
|
|
Local Plan (Part Two) |
Sets site specific criteria for developments in Hooton Park. |
|
|
Local Plan (Part Two) |
Identifies a specific area within the Stanlow Special Policy Area, for research and development uses. |
|
|
Local Plan (Part Two) |
Sets site specific criteria for developments in Ince Park., for a multi-modal resource recovery park and energy from waste facility for use in connection with the recycling, recovery and reprocessing of waste materials. |
|
|
Local Plan (Part Two) |
Supports tourism development and sets criteria for development within the historic canal port. |
|
|
Local Plan (Part Two) |
Sets criteria for safe access to new development sites for all users and the provision and protection of sufficient parking to service the needs of development, with regard to the Council’s latest adopted parking standards. |
7.3 The suggested policy approach is to combine Local Plan (Part One) policy STRAT 4 with Local Plan (Part Two) policy EP 1. The public services hub (‘The Portal’ building) has been developed and the allocation will be removed from the policies map. The regeneration of Ellesmere Port town centre will be supported.
7.4 The approach to the level of development will depend on the spatial strategy option that is chosen as set out in SS 5 ‘Spatial strategy options’ . This will identify key locations for new housing and employment development in Ellesmere Port. It may mean areas outside of existing settlements are explored for large scale industrial use, or new residential development.
7.5 Ellesmere Port is surrounded by Green Belt and the spatial strategy chosen will determine whether these policies should be amended/updated to reflect national planning policy. The Urenco Capenhurst Technology Park is located on the outskirts of Ellesmere Port and is currently identified as a commercial site in the Green Belt under Local Plan (Part Two) policy GBC 1 and GBC1.E. Key sites with considerable potential to achieve future economic growth are located in the ‘Origin’ area, this includes land in Stanlow (Local Plan (Part Two) policy EP 3 and also includes Thornton Science Park (Local Plan (Part Two) policy EP 5)); Hooton Park (Local Plan (Part Two) policy EP4); and Protos (formerly Ince Park) (Local Plan (Part Two) policy EP 6). These Local Plan (Part Two) policies will be reviewed to ensure they are up to date and reflect the consented uses or development proposals in these areas. It is intended to merge Local Plan (Part Two) policies EP 3 and EP 5, to a single Stanlow and Thornton Science Park policy.
7.6 The new Local Plan will update employment land allocations, and either retain, replace or identify new employment land allocations to meet borough wide needs. It will also update the use classes to reflect new Class E(g) Commercial Business and Service class. These will replace Local Plan (Part Two) policy EP 2.A-H at later stages of preparation of the new Local Plan.
7.7 Alongside locations for new large scale industrial/ warehousing development (linked to the plan strategy), other smaller local employment areas will remain important to the overall mix of land and premises, to provide for a wide range of sizes and types of business. The CF Fertilisers plant announced closure in 2022 and is a large scale redundant previously developed site and regeneration/redevelopment opportunity.
7.8 In line with the Council's Climate Emergency Response Plan, the policy approach will support the low carbon energy transition and decarbonisation of heavy industry.
7.9 The approach towards the historic canal port and National Waterways Museum is set out in sections 18 ‘Visitor economy’ and 26 ‘Historic environment’.
Development in Ellesmere Port has the potential to deliver substantial economic growth, through continued and new investment in the Origin area, the reuse/redevelopment of vacant or redundant sites and the regeneration of the town centre. Further housing will be delivered to complement the settlement’s role as a key employment location and support the vitality of the town centre.
The new Local Plan will set out the level and location of new development and regeneration, economic growth, industrial decarbonisation and new housing will be priorities.
Locations will be identified to deliver strategic development needs for new housing and employment development, linked to section 5 ‘Spatial strategy’ of the Plan.
Ellesmere Port Origin is a strategic employment cluster with four distinct zones;
Urenco and Capenhurst Technology Park: located in the Green Belt, close to the Ellesmere Port settlement boundary. The chosen spatial strategy will determine whether Green Belt boundaries will be amended, it is proposed to retain a policy for the site to allow for a continuation of current uses and for operational improvements within the site.
The approach to the use, design and location of developments in proximity to hazardous installations or pipelines is set out in section 21 ‘Health and wellbeing’. In exceptional cases it may be necessary to strike a balance between the need for investment and regeneration within the existing urban area and the degree of risk involved.
Subject to TA 2 ‘Key local transport infrastructure priorities’ the suggested policy approach will identify the key transport priorities for Ellesmere Port, which may include:
Appropriate provision should be made for access and parking in line with a review of parking standards and parking zones as set out in TA 1 ‘Transport and accessibility’, where there is a concentration of services, increased sustainable transport options and lower levels of car ownership.
All developments will be required to support physical and landscape improvements to the gateways, corridors and green spaces within Ellesmere Port including along the M53/Shropshire Union Canal Corridor.
Do you agree with the suggested policy approach towards Ellesmere Port, as set out in EP 1 ‘Ellesmere Port’ above? If not please suggest how it could be amended?
Do you have any comments on the use of previously developed land within Ellesmere Port?
Land at Stanlow (to be identified on the policies map) will be safeguarded for nationally significant petrochemical and related industries.
New developments are encouraged to support the low carbon energy transition, and where appropriate include measures to decarbonise heavy industrial processes (see section 28 ‘Energy’ and approach to low carbon fuel). The redevelopment of any surplus vacant, under-used or derelict land for employment or related sui generis uses will be supported.
All development proposals must include public safety and security measures and will be required to meet health and safety advice.
Proposals involving freight movements, warehousing and logistics should maximise opportunities to transport products by non-road modes of transport including the Manchester Ship Canal and rail network.
Development must minimise and mitigate any impacts on the local environment, health, residential amenity, potential for pollution, noise generation, visual impact and flood risk.
Thornton Science Park is located within Stanlow and identified for research and development. The central landscape area is important for the character and quality of the science park and should be retained and enhanced with any development proposals.
Do you agree with the suggested policy approach towards Origin - Stanlow and Thornton Science Park, as set out in EP 2 ‘Origin - Stanlow and Thornton Science Park’ above? If not please suggest how it could be amended?
Do you have any comments on the use of previously developed land within Origin - Stanlow and Thornton Science Park?
Land at Protos (to be identified on the policies map) will be safeguarded for the following;
The current policies map will be reviewed and where necessary updated in line with extant consented developments at Protos.
The policy approach will seek to ensure development is comprehensively planned and takes account of other operational, planned or consented development in Origin and the surrounding area.
The ecological mitigation areas and landscaping that form part of the consented resource recovery park are retained. See section 25 ‘Green infrastructure, biodiversity and geodiversity’
Development should make provision for public access (including public transport), having regard to operational needs of businesses and public safety.
Development must minimise and mitigate any local impacts on the local environment, health, residential amenity, potential for pollution, noise generation, visual impact and flood risk.
Do you agree with the suggested policy approach towards Origin - Protos, as set out in EP 3 ‘Origin - Protos’ above? If not please suggest how it could be amended?
Do you agree with safeguarding Origin - Protos for resource recovery and waste, reducing carbon emissions and sustainable energy generation?
Do you agree with safeguarding the level of consented waste capacity on specific plots at Origin - Protos (see also section 29 ‘Managing waste’)?
Do you have any comments on the use of previously developed land within Origin - Protos?